The geometry of drag zones adjacent to salt diapirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drag zones are highly strained regions developed adjacent to the flanks of salt diapirs, and are produced when the sedimentary overburden is folded or rotated into steeply dipping attitudes sub-parallel to the diapiric walls. This case study focuses on a diapiric province on Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, where five Visean-age salt diapirs penetrate Upper Carboniferous (Namurian–Stephanian) conglomerates, sandstones, shales and coal seams. 2D marine seismic coverage extends over several diapirs thus allowing the drag zones studied onshore to be located relative to the adjacent diapir. The width of diapiric drag zones within the case studies varies from 70 m up to 500 m, with narrow drag zones reflecting the low mean competence of shales and siltstones which may have been shallowly buried and poorly lithified at the onset of diapirism. Broader drag zones are dissected by two sets of extensional fractures together with major faults, suggesting that the overburden was semi-lithified and displayed greater flexural rigidity. Overburden displaying high competency contrasts results in strain localization and partitioning, with pervasive granulation seams and minor faults developed in sandstones and bedding-parallel shears in coal and shale horizons. Drag zones are segmented by steeply outward-dipping faults associated with decametric, asymmetric drag profiles. These faults facilitate the upward movement of material and effectively expand the diapiric process into adjacent overburden via a newly termed process of lateral diapiric accretion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".