MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2056495511 · doi:10.1242/jeb.00047

MITOCHONDRIA-RICH CELL SUBTYPES IN FISH GILL

2002· article· en· W2056495511 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine A. Sloman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitochondrionCell biologyBiologyCellCell typeUltrastructureBiochemistryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The roles of different cell types involved in ion transport in the fish gill have been widely debated but it is commonly accepted that mitochondria-rich chloride cells and pavement cells play key roles in ion and acid—base transport in freshwater fish. Mitochondria-rich cells function in acid—base regulation by altering chloride and carbonate exchange, while pavement cells are currently believed to be the site of sodium uptake at the gill.Galvez and colleagues focus on the mitochondria-rich chloride cells in the freshwater trout gill. They use a novel magnetic bead separation technique to isolate different mitochondria-rich cell subtypes. The existence of these cell subtypes in fish gill had been proposed but evidence to support their existence was lacking.Different sub-types of mitochondria-rich cells in other animals have been identified by looking at the differential binding of peanut lectin agglutinin (PNA) to the apical surfaces of mitochondria-rich cell types. Galvez and colleagues adopted this technique to distinguish between subtypes of mitochondria-rich cells in the fish gill.Research on the fish gill from their lab indicates that PNA binds to mitochondria-rich chloride cells on the apical surface of the gill epithelium. Here, they use PNA binding to separate mitochondria-rich gill cells into PNA+ and PNA- populations. They identify the existence of at least two mitochondria-rich cell subtypes. The ultrastructure of the PNA+ cells was characteristic of mitochondria-rich chloride cells, whereas the PNA- cell morphology was reminiscent of pavement cells.The functional properties of these subtypes in acid—base regulation were examined by the expression of two proteins important in epithelial transport. The Na+-K+-ATPase is involved in energising both sodium and chloride uptake across the gill and the H+-ATPase provides an electrochemical gradient that drives sodium movement. The expression of these proteins under normal, acidosis and alkalosis conditions was examined.Both ATPases were expressed in the PNA+ and PNA- cell types. However, both of these proteins were expressed differently in the two subtypes during acid—base disturbances. Most notably, only the PNA- cell types responded during acidosis, by increasing expression of the H+-ATPase.The authors suggest that the site of proton excretion in gill tissue is the PNA- cells and that the PNA+ cells are analogous in function to the β-mitochondria-rich chloride cells of the mammalian kidney collecting ducts, which are responsible for base-secretion. In the mammalian kidney, there is a functional separation of mitochondria-rich cell types into acid-secreting and base-secreting cells. Separating and identifying different subtypes in the fish gill is both important and interesting to determine whether the functional separation also occurs in gill tissue.Galvez and colleagues are now hoping to clone the apical anion exchanger in the PNA+ mitochondria-rich chloride cells of the fish gill. The use of magnetic bead separation to enrich for PNA+ mitochondria-rich chloride cells should help improve the ability of cloning rare transport proteins on this cell type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→