MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exclusive electroproduction of two pions at HERA

2012· article· en· W2056503271 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronStrongScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSKorea Science and Engineering FoundationFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHERAPionLuminosityZEUS (particle detector)Range (aeronautics)PhotonProton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exclusive electroproduction of two pions in the mass range 0.4 < M < 2.5 GeV has been studied with the ZEUS detector at HERA using an integrated luminosity of 82 pb -1 . The analysis was carried out in the kine-matic range of 2 < Q 2 < 80 GeV 2 , 32 < W < 180 GeV and |t| < 0.6 GeV 2 , where Q 2 is the photon virtuality, W is the photon-proton centre-of-mass energy and t is the squared four-momentum transfer at the proton vertex. The two-pion invariant-mass distribution is interpreted in terms of the pion electromagnetic form factor, |F (M )|, assuming that the studied mass range includes the contributions of the , and vector-meson states. The masses and widths of the resonances were obtained and the Q 2 dependence of the cross-section ratios ( )/ () and ( )/ () was extracted. The pion form factor obtained in the present analysis is compared to that obtained in e + e - + -.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207