Entrapment of <i>tert</i>-Butyllithium and Lithium <i>tert</i>-Butylamide Monomers by Partially Lithiated Derivatives of Aluminum and Gallium Primary Amide Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lithiation of the dimeric trisamido group 13 derivatives {M[N(H) t -Bu] 3 } 2 ( 1a, M = Al; 1b, M = Ga) by alkyllithium reagents RLi (R = t -Bu or Me), at different stoichiometries, was investigated. On the basis of NMR data, the initial lithiation of 1a occurs at the bridging N(H) t -Bu groups to give the mono- and dilithiated derivatives Li x [Al 2 (N t -Bu) x (NH t -Bu) 6 - x ] ( x = 1, 2). The reaction of 1a with t -BuLi in a 1:3 molar ratio in n -pentane at 23 °C produces {Li[Al(N t -Bu)(NH t -Bu) 2 ]} 2 ·( t -BuLi) ( 2 ) in 67% yield, whereas the treatment of 1a with MeLi in diethyl ether at 23 °C yields {Li[Al(N t -Bu)(NH t -Bu) 2 ]} 2 ·[LiN(H) t -Bu] ( 7 ) and {Li[Al(N t -Bu)(NH t -Bu) 2 ]} 2 ( 8 ). The gallium analogue of 7, i.e., {Li[Ga(N t -Bu)(NH t -Bu) 2 ]} 2 ·[LiN(H) t -Bu] ( 5 ), was obtained in 47% yield by the reaction of 1b with t -BuLi in a 1:3 molar ratio in n -pentane at 23 °C. The structures of 2, 5, and 7 have been determined by X-ray crystallography and were shown to involve the entrapment of a monomeric t -BuLi or LiN(H) t -Bu fragment by a dilithiated derivative of 1a or 1b . The six fused four-membered rings give rise to a concave, lounge-chair arrangement for the 12-atom [Li 3 Al 2 N 6 E (E = C or N)] clusters of 2, 5, and 7 . Variable-temperature 1 H NMR spectra of 2, 5, and 7 in C 7 D 8 over the range −90 to 23 °C reveal a fluxional process involving Li−N bond breaking and formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".