Drug-Induced Hepatitis and Lupus during Infliximab Treatment for Psoriasis: Case Report and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) can induce elevation of hepatic aminotransferase levels. Hepatitis has been reported in patients treated with IFX and with risk factors such as viral hepatitis, alcohol intake, or concomitant use of hepatotoxic drugs. Liver disorders occurring in a patient without risk factors have rarely been reported, and liver biopsies to substantiate the liver changes have very rarely been described. The presence of lupus-like symptoms with newly positive antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), sometimes with double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) antibodies, has also been reported with IFX. Only a few articles have reported in detail these types of adverse events in patients with psoriasis. To our knowledge, the combination of lupus-like symptoms with simultaneous occurrence of a biopsy-proven hepatitis has not been reported with the use of IFX for psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: Description of a case of drug-induced hepatitis in a patient with concurrent clinical and serologic features of lupus induced by IFX. METHODS: We present the case of a 40-year-old woman with psoriasis who developed a biopsy-proven drug-induced hepatitis and concurrent lupus symptoms with positive ANAs while under IFX treatment. A review of related publications is presented. CONCLUSION: The clinician must be aware of uncommon side effects of IFX, such as liver anomalies and development of autoantibodies. Liver enzymes should be monitored regularly, and ANAs should be checked if liver enzymes are increasing and in the presence of lupus symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".