Rapid additive‐free TEMPO‐mediated stable free radical polymerizations of styrene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The stable free radical polymerization (SFRP) of styrene, initiated with benzoyl peroxide in the presence of TEMPO, under bulk conditions, is demonstrated to proceed rapidly without the need for any rate enhancing additives such as camphorsulfonic acid, 2‐fluoro‐1‐methyl pyridinium p‐toluenesulfonate, or acetic anhydride. Monomer conversions as high as 70% can be achieved in 5 h or less while maintaining polydispersity indexes of 1.15. These results stand in stark contrast to earlier reactions that required 70 h to achieve similar conversions. This study demonstrates that the single largest factor governing the rates of polymerization is the molar concentration of excess TEMPO remaining in solution after initiation. A reduction in the TEMPO to BPO ratio is required when large amounts of BPO are used to target low molecular weight polystyrenes. However, when a lower molar amount of BPO is used to obtain high molecular weight polystyrenes, a higher TEMPO to BPO ratio is required. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5487–5493, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".