Differential Effect of Burn Injury on Fibroblasts from Wounds and Normal Skin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there are well-recognized fluctuations in the systemic concentration of cytokines and growth factors after burn injuries, the effect on wound-healing potential in patients is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize the proliferation rate and response of wound and dermal fibroblasts to cytokines in burn patients compared with normal subjects. METHODS: Polyvinyl alcohol sponges were implanted subcutaneously in normal subjects and burn patients soon after admission. Sponges were removed for wound fibroblast explantation after 12 days. At the same time, a small piece of skin was excised for dermal fibroblast explantation. Fibroblast proliferation was then quantified after exposure to 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% fetal bovine serum, interleukin-1, transforming growth factor-beta1, or interferon-alpha2b. RESULTS: Normal subjects' dermal fibroblasts (n = 7) exposed to 10% fetal bovine serum showed significantly increased proliferation relative to normal subjects' wound fibroblasts (n = 3) (p < 0.0005), burn patients' dermal fibroblasts (n = 5) (p < 0.05), and burn patients' wound fibroblasts (n = 5) (p < 0.0001). Burn patients' dermal fibroblast proliferation was also significantly augmented relative to burn patients' wound fibroblasts (p < 0.005); however, there was no significant difference between the two wound fibroblast types. Proliferation of burn subjects' fibroblasts was significantly enhanced with the addition of interleukin-1 and significantly decreased for dermal fibroblasts with interferon-alpha2b. A significant elevation of proliferation with transforming growth factor-beta1 was seen only with burn patients' dermal fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that systemic mediators markedly alter the proliferation potential of dermal fibroblasts but not of wound fibroblasts. However, the wound environment substantially alters both the proliferation rate and the responsiveness of fibroblasts to cytokines. Thus, the data support the value of using wound fibroblasts during preliminary in vitro experiments to investigate wound-healing modification by cytokine manipulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".