MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differential Effect of Burn Injury on Fibroblasts from Wounds and Normal Skin

2007· article· en· W2056554952 on OpenAlexaff
Bernadette Nedelec, Ana de Oliveira, Michel Saint‐Cyr, Dominique R. Garrel

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityHôtel-Dieu de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibroblastWound healingDermal fibroblastMedicineDermisBurn injuryBurn woundFetusAndrologyFetal bovine serumImmunologyPathologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineChemistryBiologySurgeryCell cultureCellPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although there are well-recognized fluctuations in the systemic concentration of cytokines and growth factors after burn injuries, the effect on wound-healing potential in patients is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize the proliferation rate and response of wound and dermal fibroblasts to cytokines in burn patients compared with normal subjects. METHODS: Polyvinyl alcohol sponges were implanted subcutaneously in normal subjects and burn patients soon after admission. Sponges were removed for wound fibroblast explantation after 12 days. At the same time, a small piece of skin was excised for dermal fibroblast explantation. Fibroblast proliferation was then quantified after exposure to 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% fetal bovine serum, interleukin-1, transforming growth factor-beta1, or interferon-alpha2b. RESULTS: Normal subjects' dermal fibroblasts (n = 7) exposed to 10% fetal bovine serum showed significantly increased proliferation relative to normal subjects' wound fibroblasts (n = 3) (p < 0.0005), burn patients' dermal fibroblasts (n = 5) (p < 0.05), and burn patients' wound fibroblasts (n = 5) (p < 0.0001). Burn patients' dermal fibroblast proliferation was also significantly augmented relative to burn patients' wound fibroblasts (p < 0.005); however, there was no significant difference between the two wound fibroblast types. Proliferation of burn subjects' fibroblasts was significantly enhanced with the addition of interleukin-1 and significantly decreased for dermal fibroblasts with interferon-alpha2b. A significant elevation of proliferation with transforming growth factor-beta1 was seen only with burn patients' dermal fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that systemic mediators markedly alter the proliferation potential of dermal fibroblasts but not of wound fibroblasts. However, the wound environment substantially alters both the proliferation rate and the responsiveness of fibroblasts to cytokines. Thus, the data support the value of using wound fibroblasts during preliminary in vitro experiments to investigate wound-healing modification by cytokine manipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207