The prevalence of urinary catheterization in women and men with multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of urinary catheterization in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). DESIGN/INTERVENTION: After obtaining Institutional Review Board exemption, results from the Fall 2005 North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) survey were reviewed. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents to the fall 2005 NARCOMS survey. OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), the Short Form-12 (SF-12), the Patient Determined Disease Steps measure of physical disability, and urologic history were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the χ(2) and Student's t-tests, and multivariable logistic and linear regression. RESULTS: Of 9702 (58%) responses were returned, excluding respondents with prior bladder surgery, 9676 participants were reviewed: primarily white (92.9%), women (75.3%), with average age of diagnosis of 30.2 (SD 10.0) years. Urinary catheterization was reported by 2514 (26%) respondents, with 1091 (11%) reporting current and 1423 (15%) past catheter use. Among all catheter types (possibly ≥ 1), intermittent self-catheterization was most common (81%), followed by transurethral Foley catheterization (43%) and suprapubic catheterization (8%). Males were more likely to catheterize than females (32 versus 24%, P < 0.001) and use indwelling methods (P < 0.001). Catheterizing patients reported longer disease duration, greater physical disability, increased overactive bladder symptoms, and reduced quality of life (QoL) scores (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate significant rates (1 in 4) of urinary catheterization in patients with MS. Although thought to be common, the true rates of catheter use among MS patient were previously unknown. Urinary catheterization appears to be associated with reduced QoL, increased physical disability and longer disease duration as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".