MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056573634 · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2522

Expanding fungal pathogenesis: Cryptococcus breaks out of the opportunistic box

2011· review· en· W2056573634 on OpenAlexafffund
James W. Kronstad, Rodgoun Attarian, Brigitte Cadieux, Jaehyuk Choi, Cletus A. D’Souza, Emma Griffiths, Jennifer M. H. Geddes, Guanggan Hu, Won Hee Jung, Matthias Kretschmer, Sanjay Saikia, Joyce Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Reviews Microbiology · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaNational Institutes of HealthBurroughs Wellcome Fund
KeywordsBiologyCryptococcus neoformansCryptococcusFungal pathogenCryptococcus gattiiFungusPathogenOpportunistic pathogenCryptococcosisMicrobiologyAdaptation (eye)GeneGeneticsVirulenceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations343
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Reviews MicrobiologySame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207