MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056582500 · doi:10.1080/13602004.2010.533451

Muslims and the Politics of “Reasonable Accommodation”: Analyzing the Bouchard-Taylor Report and its Impact on the Canadian Province of Québec

2010· article· en· W2056582500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meena Sharify-Funk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Muslim Minority Affairs · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecularismInterculturalismReasonable accommodationCommissionPoliticsSociologyMulticulturalismCivil societyAccommodationPublic administrationPolitical scienceLawGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2007 the Premier of Québec, Canada, appointed the Bouchard-Taylor Commission to investigate and defuse growing controversies surrounding the accommodation of cultural and religious diversity in the Province. This article analyzes the Commission's efforts to address the contested nature of secularism and interculturalism in Québec, as well as the impact of the Commission's inquiry on the Muslim minority community in Canada. It examines some of the significant aspects of both the Bouchard-Taylor Commission and its Final Report. It also provides firsthand, evaluative commentary from representatives of Muslim organizations based in Montreal, Canada. Particular attention is given to the concerns surrounding the integration of Muslims in a Francophone society anxious to preserve an “authentic” culture, as well as to the didactic role assumed by the Report's authors in their efforts to clarify the bases for an integration model premised on interculturalism and open secularism. Finally, an assessment is offered with respect to the value of public dialogue conducted with intent to strengthen social cohesion and solidarity within modern, pluralistic societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0460.019
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Muslim Minority AffairsSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207