Muslims and the Politics of “Reasonable Accommodation”: Analyzing the Bouchard-Taylor Report and its Impact on the Canadian Province of Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2007 the Premier of Québec, Canada, appointed the Bouchard-Taylor Commission to investigate and defuse growing controversies surrounding the accommodation of cultural and religious diversity in the Province. This article analyzes the Commission's efforts to address the contested nature of secularism and interculturalism in Québec, as well as the impact of the Commission's inquiry on the Muslim minority community in Canada. It examines some of the significant aspects of both the Bouchard-Taylor Commission and its Final Report. It also provides firsthand, evaluative commentary from representatives of Muslim organizations based in Montreal, Canada. Particular attention is given to the concerns surrounding the integration of Muslims in a Francophone society anxious to preserve an “authentic” culture, as well as to the didactic role assumed by the Report's authors in their efforts to clarify the bases for an integration model premised on interculturalism and open secularism. Finally, an assessment is offered with respect to the value of public dialogue conducted with intent to strengthen social cohesion and solidarity within modern, pluralistic societies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.046 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".