MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Group I disynaptic excitation of cat hindlimb flexor and bifunctional motoneurones during fictive locomotion

2000· article· en· W2056636841 on OpenAlexaff
J. Quevedo, Brent Fedirchuk, Simon Gosgnach, David A. McCrea

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsHindlimbStimulationMotor neuronAnatomyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialNeuroscienceChemistryDecerebrate StateDecerebrationMedicineSpinal cordBiologyInhibitory postsynaptic potentialElectric stimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incidence of short latency excitation of motoneurones innervating flexor and bifunctional muscles evoked by group I intensity (<= 2 x threshold) electrical stimulation of hindlimb muscle nerves was investigated during fictive locomotion in decerebrate cats. Intracellular recordings were made from hindlimb motoneurones in which action potentials were blocked by intracellular diffusion of a lidocaine (lignocaine) derivative (QX-314) and fictive locomotion was evoked by electrical stimulation of the midbrain. Few motoneurones (16%) received group I-evoked oligosynaptic excitation in the absence of fictive locomotion. During fictive locomotion 39/44 (89%) motoneurones innervating ankle, knee or hip flexor muscles and 18/28 (64%) motoneurones innervating bifunctional muscles received group I-evoked oligosynaptic EPSPs. In flexor motoneurones, locomotor-dependent excitation was present in both step cycle phases but largest during flexion. In bifunctional motoneurones, EPSPs were often largest at the transition between flexion and extension phases. Activation of homonymous afferents most consistently evoked the largest locomotor-dependent excitation (amplitude up to 4.6 mV), but in some cases stimulation of heteronymous flexor or bifunctional muscle nerves evoked large EPSPs. EPSP amplitude became maximal as stimulation intensity was increased to about twice threshold. This suggests that tendon organ afferents can evoke group I EPSPs during locomotion. The EPSPs resulting from brief, small stretches of extensor digitorum longus tendons indicate that group Ia muscle spindle afferents can also evoke the group I excitation of flexors. Stimulation of extensor group I afferents did not result in excitation of flexor motoneurones. The mean latency of locomotor-dependent group I excitation in flexor and bifunctional motoneurones was 1.64 +/- 0.16 ms, indicating a path consisting of a single interneurone interposed between group I afferents and motoneurones innervating flexor and bifunctional muscles. This disynaptic excitation is analogous to that recorded in extensor motoneurones and evoked from extensor group I afferents during locomotion. Differences in the phase dependence and sources of group I excitation to flexor and extensor motoneurones during locomotion suggest the existence of separate groups of excitatory interneurones exciting flexor and extensor motoneurones. The wide distribution of group I disynaptic excitation in motoneurones innervating extensor, flexor and bifunctional muscles acting on hip, knee and ankle joints suggests that these pathways can play an important role in the reinforcement of ongoing locomotor activity throughout the limb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207