MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056685938 · doi:10.1139/g99-108

Gene content and organization of a 281-kbp contig from the genome of the extremely thermophilic archaeon,<i>Sulfolobus solfataricus</i>P2

2000· article· en· W2056685938 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Robert L. Charlebois, Rama Kant Singh, Christina Chan-Weiher, Ghislaine Allard, Cynthia Chow, Fabrice Confalonieri, Bruce A. Curtis, Michel Duguet, Gaël Erauso, David M. Faguy, Terry Gaasterland, Roger A. Garrett, Paul M. K. Gordon, Alex C. Jeffries, Catherine Kozera, Neena Kushwaha, Édith Lafleur, Xu Peng, Susanne Penny, Qunxin She, Andrew St. Jean, John van der Oost, Felix Young, Yvan Zivanovic, W. Ford Doolittle, Mark A. Ragan, Christoph W. Sensen

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsLethbridge CollegeInstitute for Marine BiosciencesUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsSulfolobus solfataricusBiologyOperonGeneSulfolobusGeneticsContigGenomeIntronBiosynthesisArchaeaEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sequence of a 281-kbp contig from the crenarchaeote Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 was determined and analysed. Notable features in this region include 29 ribosomal protein genes, 12 tRNA genes (four of which contain archaeal-type introns), operons encoding enzymes of histidine biosynthesis, pyrimidine biosynthesis, and arginine biosynthesis, an ATPase operon, numerous genes for enzymes of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and six insertion sequences. The content and organization of this contig are compared with sequences from crenarchaeotes, euryarchaeotes, bacteria, and eukaryotes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207