Spectroscopy and MRCI calculations on CrF and CrCl
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The B 6Π–X 6Σ+ band system of the CrCl radical has been recorded in thermal emission with FTS techniques in the region 6900–11 700 cm−1, using a resolution of 0.025 cm−1. An analysis of the (0,0) band of this system has been carried out. A rotational constant of B0=0.1615 cm−1 and a spin–orbit parameter of A0=51 cm−1 have been estimated for the B 6Π state. Improved values for the γ and λ parameters of the X 6Σ+ ground state have been obtained. MRCI calculations have been performed on CrF and CrCl and comparisons have been made with both experiments and DFT calculations [Bencheikh et al., J. Chem. Phys. 106, 6231 (1997)]. The calculations on CrF have provided valuable aids in the interpretations of the fluorescence excitation and dispersed fluorescence spectra of a state observed at 31 700 cm−1. This state has now been assigned as D 6Π. A number of transitions in the dispersed fluorescence spectra are believed to involve the hitherto unknown C 6Δ state. Spin–orbit-configuration-interaction (SO-CI) calculations have been carried out on both CrF and CrCl. It is shown that the second-order spin–orbit parameters λe of the X 6Σ+ ground states are due mainly to interactions with the B 6Π states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".