MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2056758832 · doi:10.1136/ebm.6.3.79

Glyburide was as safe and effective as insulin in gestational diabetes

2001· article· en· W2056758832 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestational diabetesMedicineDiabetes mellitusInsulinWeb of scienceGestationPregnancyInternal medicineObstetricsGynecologyEndocrinologyGastroenterologyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(2000) N Engl J Med 343, 1134. Langer O, Conway DL, Berkus MD, et al. . A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. . Oct 19; . : . –8. . [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: Is glyburide as effective and safe as insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus? Randomised (allocation concealed*), unblinded,* controlled trial. Maternal health clinics in San Antonio, Texas, USA. 404 women (mean age 29.5 y) who were between 11 and 33 weeks of gestation with a singleton pregnancy and who had gestational diabetes and fasting blood glucose concentrations ≥5.3 mmol/l and <7.8 mmol/l. Follow up was 100%. 404 women were allocated to receive glyburide (n=201) or insulin (n=203). Glyburide was started at an oral dose of 2.5 mg and increased to 20 mg as needed. Insulin was started at a dose of 0.7 U/kg of actual body weight, given subcutaneously 3 times/day, and increased as needed. … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DNew%2BEngland%2BJournal%2Bof%2BMedicine%26rft.stitle%253DNEJM%26rft.issn%253D0028-4793%26rft.aulast%253DLanger%26rft.auinit1%253DO.%26rft.volume%253D343%26rft.issue%253D16%26rft.spage%253D1134%26rft.epage%253D1138%26rft.atitle%253DA%2BComparison%2Bof%2BGlyburide%2Band%2BInsulin%2Bin%2BWomen%2Bwith%2BGestational%2BDiabetes%2BMellitus%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1056%252FNEJM200010193431601%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11036118%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJM200010193431601&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11036118&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F6%2F3%2F79.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089882800001&link_type=ISI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Non-randomized triallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Randomized triallow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it