Formation of Pent-4-en-1-amine, the Counterpart of Acrylamide from Lysine and Its Conversion into Piperidine in Lysine/Glucose Reaction Mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isotope labeling studies performed using lysine/glucose model systems have indicated that lysine can generate piperidine, a reactive amine capable of undergoing Maillard type interactions. Two possible mechanisms were identified for the formation of piperidine: one arising through decarboxylation of lysine alone to generate cadaverine (1,5-diaminopentane) followed by deamination to form pent-4-en-1-amine which in turn can cyclize into piperidine where both Nepsilon and Nalpha atoms of lysine can be equally involved in its generation due to the symmetrical nature of the precursor diamine. On the other hand, in the presence of sugars, lysine, similarly to asparagine and phenylalanine, can undergo carbonyl-assisted decarboxylative deamination reaction to generate pent-4-en-1-amine, the counterpart of acrylamide. The pent-4-en-1-amine can then cyclize to form piperidine through the Nepsilon atom of lysine. To confirm the formation of pent-4-en-1-amine in the lysine/glucose model system, a useful strategy based on Py-GC/MS analysis was developed using isotope labeling technique to identify sugar adducts of pent-4-en-1-amine. Products simultaneously possessing five lysine carbon atoms (C2'-C6') and the Nepsilon-amino group from lysine in addition to glucose carbon atoms were targeted using specifically labeled precursors such as [(15)Nalpha]lysine.2HCl, [(15)Nepsilon]lysine.2HCl, [U-(13)C(6)]lysine.2HCl, [(13)C-6]lysine.2HCl and [U-(13)C(6)]glucose. The complete labeling studies along with structural analysis using synthetic and other available precursors have shown the presence of a peak that satisfies the above criteria, and the peak was tentatively identified as N-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)methylidene]penta-1,3-dien-1-amine incorporating pent-4-en-1-amine in its structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".