MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2056773833 · doi:10.1117/12.440128

Modeling of the orientational and structural dynamics of single-stranded DNA probe molecules immobilized on fused silica and glass surfaces

2001· article· en· W2056773833 on OpenAlexaff
Jiang Zeng, Xiaofeng Wang, Ulrich J. Krull

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMolecular dynamicsMoleculeFluorescenceIntercalation (chemistry)Chemical physicsNanotechnologyChemistryOpticsComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immobilization of single-stranded DNA onto fused silica and glass surfaces has been widely used for preparation of fiber optic sensors and DNA microarrays. Fundamental investigations of the orientation, motion and hybridization behavior of immobilized ssDNA is important to understand the design sensing devices. Using computational methods to evaluate molecular dynamics w have simulated a solid SiO2-linker-ssDNA system and studied the conformations assumed by such immobilized material under different physical constraints. We have also evaluated the molecular dynamics of fluorescent intercalating dyes that are attached to the ssDNA by tethers of various lengths, with the goal of preparing a label on ssDNA that will transducer hybridization. Periodic boundary conditions were applied to examine packing properties and nearest neighbor interactions of adjacent ssDNA molecules. Molecular dynamics have been performed at room temperature as well as on heated systems. Solvent effects were taken into account and the modeling assumed the presence of an aqueous environment. The results suggest the various conformations and orientations that immobilized ssDNA can assume, and indicate that the orientation is generally far more that is perpendicular to the interface. Exploration of tether lengths indicates the minimum lengths that are required for a fluorescent label to operate efficiently as an intercalating agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→