MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

rhBMP‐2/αBSM® Induces Significant Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation and Dental Implant Osseointegration

2002· article· en· W2056813178 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ulf M. E. Wikesjö, Rachel G. Sorensen, Atsuhiro Kinoshita, John M. Wozney

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersW. L. Gore and Associates
KeywordsOsseointegrationImplantAlveolar ridgeDentistryDental alveolusMedicineDental implantBone formationBone morphogenetic proteinSurgeryChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in a carrier has been shown to induce significant bone formation. Several candidate carriers, however, lack structural integrity to offset compressive forces that may compromise rhBMP-2 bone induction, in particular, for challenging onlay indications such as alveolar ridge augmentation. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate rhBMP-2 in a calcium-phosphate cement carrier, alphaBSM, for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and immediate dental implant osseointegration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six adult Hound Labrador mongrels with 5 mm critical size supra-alveolar peri-implant defects were used. Three animals received rhBMP-2/alphaBSM (rhBMP-2 at 0.40 and 0.75 mg/mL) in contralateral jaw quadrants (total implant volume/defect approximately 1.5 mL). Three animals received alphaBSM without rhBMP-2 (control group). The animals were euthanized at 16 weeks post surgery, and block biopsies were processed for histologic and histometric analysis. RESULTS: rhBMP-2/alphaBSM induced substantial augmentation of the alveolar ridge. Control sites exhibited limited new bone formation. Vertical bone augmentation averaged (+/- SD) 4.9 +/- 1.0 mm (rhBMP-2 at 0.40 mg/mL), 5.3 +/- 0.3 mm (rhBMP-2 at 0.75 mg/mL), and 0.4 +/- 0.4 mm (control); new bone area 8.5 +/- 4.2 mm2, 9.0 +/- 1.9 mm2, and 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm2; new bone density 55.1 +/- 6.4%, 61.1 +/- 6.0%, and 67.7 +/- 9.5%; and new bone-implant contact 26.9 +/- 17.5%, 28.5 +/- 1.4%, and 24.6 +/- 16.1%, respectively. Residual alphaBSM comprised < 1% of the new bone. Bone density for the contiguous resident bone ranged from 65 to 71%, and bone-implant contact ranged from 49 to 64%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical implantation of rhBMP-2/alphaBSM appears an effective protocol for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation procedures and immediate dental implant osseointegration and for onlay indications of lesser complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207