Experimental and theoretical investigation of the main fragmentation pathways of protonated H-Gly-Gly-Sar-OH and H-Gly-Sar-Sar-OH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fragmentation pathways of protonated H-Gly-Gly-Sar-OH and H-Gly-Sar-Sar-OH are investigated by using both computational and experimental techniques. The main goal of these studies is to further investigate which factors determine the branching ratio of the b2-y1 (Paizs, B.; Suhai, S. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 16, 375.) and "diketopiperazine" (Cordero, M. M.; Houser, J. J.; Wesdemiotis, C. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1594.) pathways of protonated tripeptides. Protonated H-Gly-Sar-Sar-OH represents a sensitive test for the branching ratio of the b2-y1 and "diketopiperazine" pathways since this ion cannot produce y1 ions on the b(-y1 channel but only b2 ions. Protonated H-Gly-Gly-Sar-OH and H-Gly-Sar-Sar-OH exhibit very different fragmentation behavior under the investigated experimental conditions. The former fragments forming mainly y1 ions (maximum abundance of the b2 and y2 ions is approximately 15%), while the latter produces mainly b2 ions while at larger internal energies the a2, y2, and y1 ions become also moderately abundant. Theoretical modeling and analysis of the main fragmentation pathways indicate that the majority of the b2 and y1 ions of protonated H-Gly-Gly-Sar-OH and the b2 ions of H-Gly-Sar-Sar-OH are formed on the b2-y1 pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".