An ethylene-induced cDNA encoding a lipase expressed at the onset of senescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cDNA clone encoding a lipase (lipolytic acyl hydrolase) expressed at the onset of petal senescence has been isolated by screening a cDNA expression library prepared from carnation flowers (Dianthus caryophyllus). The cDNA contains the lipase consensus sequence, ITFAGHSLGA, and encodes a 447-amino acid polypeptide with a calculated molecular mass of 50.2 kDa that appears to be a cytosolic protein. Over-expression of the clone in Escherichia coli yielded a protein of the expected molecular weight that proved capable of deesterifying fatty acids from p-nitrophenylpalmitate, tri-linolein, soybean phospholipid, and Tween in both in vitro and in situ assays of enzyme activity. The abundance of the lipase mRNA increases just as carnation flowers begin to senesce, and expression of the gene is also induced by treatment with ethylene. Southern blot analyses of carnation genomic DNA have indicated that the lipase is a single copy gene. The lipase gene is also expressed in carnation leaves and is up-regulated when the leaves are treated with ethylene. Deesterification of membrane lipids and ensuing loss of membrane structural integrity are well established early events of plant senescence, and the expression pattern of this lipase gene together with the lipolytic activity of its cognate protein indicate that it plays a fundamentally central role in mediating the onset of senescence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".