Cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in children anaesthetized with propofol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Propofol, by virtue of its favourable pharmacokinetic profile, is suitable for maintenance of anaesthesia by continuous infusion during neurosurgical procedures in adults. It is gaining popularity for use in paediatric patients. To determine the effects of propofol on carbon dioxide cerebrovascular reactivity in children, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity was measured at different levels of endtidal (PECO2) by transcranial Doppler sonography. METHODS: Ten ASA I or II children, aged 1-6 years undergoing elective urological surgery were enrolled. Anaesthesia comprized propofol aimed at producing an estimated steady-state serum concentration of 3 microg x ml-1 and a caudal epidural block. PECO2 was adjusted randomly in an increasing or decreasing fashion between 3.3, 5.2 and 7.2 kPa (25, 40 and 55 mmHg) with an exogenous source of CO2 while maintaining ventilation parameters constant. RESULTS: Cerebral blood flow velocity increased as PECO2 increased from 3.3 to 5.2 kPa (25-40 mmHg) (P < 0.001) and from 5.2 to 7.2 kPa (40-55 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Mean heart rate and blood pressure did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity is maintained over PECO2 values of 3.3, 5.2 and 7.2 kPa (25, 40 and 55 mmHg) in healthy children anaesthetized with propofol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".