Addition of Cyclopropyl Alkynes to a Brook Silene: Definitive Evidence for a Biradical Intermediate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The addition of three newly developed mechanistic probes, (trans-2-phenylcyclopropyl)ethyne, (trans,trans-2-methoxy-3-phenylcyclopropyl)ethyne, and (trans,trans-2-methoxy-1-methyl-3-phenylcyclopropyl)ethyne, 1a-c, to a Brook silene, 2-tert-butyl-2-trimethylsiloxy-1,1-bis(trimethylsilyl)-1-silene, 10, was examined. When alkyne 1a was added to silene 10 products derived from a formal ene reaction were obtained. When alkynes 1b-c were added to silene 10, in addition to the typical silacyclobutenes, a variety of silacycloheptenes were obtained in which the cyclopropyl ring had clearly opened. Formal ene-addition products were also produced from the addition of 1b to 10. Based on the relative positions of the phenyl and methoxy substituents within the seven-membered ring of the silacycloheptenes and the known behavior of the alkyne probes under both radical and ionic conditions, it was concluded that a biradical intermediate was formed during the addition of alkynes 1b-c to silene 10. In the addition of alkynes 1a-b to silene 10, the ene products are most likely formed by a competitive pericyclic reaction. We also present a straightforward method for the unambiguous determination of the regiochemistry of silacyclobutenes derived from the cycloaddition of terminal alkynes to silenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".