MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057108650 · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00149.2012

Renal hemodynamic response to<scp>l</scp>-arginine in uncomplicated, type 1 diabetes mellitus: the role of buffering anions and tubuloglomerular feedback

2012· article· en· W2057108650 on OpenAlexafffund
Alberto Montanari, A Biggi, Aderville Cabassi, Irene Pelloni, Filippo Pigazzani, Silvana Pinelli, Giovanna Pelà, Luisa Musiari, David Z.I. Cherney

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon Transport and Channel Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTubuloglomerular feedbackEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicineRenal functionRenal blood flowHemodynamicsDiabetes mellitusMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the "tubulocentric" hypothesis of the glomerular hyperfiltration of diabetes mellitus (DM), tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) is the critical determinant of the related renal hemodynamic dysfunction. To examine the role of TGF in human type 1 DM, 12 salt-replete healthy (C) and 11 uncomplicated DM individuals underwent measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal blood flow (RBF), and lithium-derived absolute "distal" sodium delivery (DDNa). Measurements were made during two 3-h infusions of 0.012 mmol·kg(-1)·min(-1) l-arginine (ARG) buffered with either equimolar HCl (ARG.HCl) or citric acid (ARG.CITR). Our hypothesis was that changes in TGF signaling would be directionally opposite ARG.HCl vs. ARG.CITR according to the effects of the ARG-buffering anion on DDNa. Similar changes in C and DM followed ARG.CITR, with declines in DDNa (-0.26 ± 0.07 mmol/min C vs. -0.31 ± 0.07 mmol/min DM) and increases in RBF (+299 ± 25 vs. +319 ± 29 ml·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)) and GFR (+6.6 ± 0.8 vs. +11.6 ± 1.2 ml·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2)). In contrast, with ARG.HCl, DDNa rose in both groups (P = 0.001), but the response was 73% greater in DM (+1.50 ± 0.15 mmol/min C vs. +2.59 ± 0.22 mmol/min DM, P = 0.001). RBF also increased (P = 0.001, +219 ± 20 ml·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2) C, +105 ± 14 DM), but ΔRBF after ARG.HCl was lower vs. ARG.CITR in both groups (P = 0.001). After ARG.HCl, ΔRBF also was 50% lower in DM vs. C (P = 0.001) and GFR, unchanged in C, declined in DM (-7.4 ± 0.9 ml·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2), P = 0.02 vs. C). After ARG.HCl, unlike ARG.CITR, DDNa increased in C and DM, associated with less ΔRBF and ΔGFR vs. ARG.CITR. This suggests that the renal hemodynamic response to ARG is influenced substantially by the opposite actions of HCl vs. CITR on DDNa and TGF. In DM, the association of ARG.HCl-induced exaggerated ΔDDNa, blunted ΔRBF, and the decline in GFR vs. C shows an enhanced TGF dependence of renal vasodilatation to ARG, in agreement with a critical role of TGF in DM-related renal hemodynamic dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Renal PhysiologySame topicIon Transport and Channel RegulationFrench-language works237,207