Submicroscopic deletions and duplications in individuals with intellectual disability detected by array‐CGH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intellectual disability (ID) affects about 3% of the population (IQ < 70), and in about 40% of moderate (IQ 35-49) to severe ID (IQ < 34), and 70% of cases of mild ID (IQ 50-70), the etiology of the disease remains unknown. It has long been suspected that chromosomal gains and losses undetectable by routine cytogenetic analysis (i.e., less than 5-10 Mb in size) are implicated in ID of unknown etiology. Array CGH has recently been used to perform a genome-wide screen for submicroscopic gains and losses in individuals with a normal karyotype but with features suggestive of a chromosome abnormality. In two recent studies, the technique has demonstrated a approximately 15% detection rate for de novo copy number changes of individual clones or groups of clones. Here, we describe a study of 22 individuals with mild to moderate ID and nonsyndromic pattern of dysmorphic features suspicious of an underlying chromosome abnormality, using the 3 Mb and 1 Mb commercial arrays (Spectral Genomics). Deletions and duplications of 16 clones, previously described to show copy number variability in normal individuals [Iafrate et al., 2004; Lapierre et al., 2004; Schoumans et al., 2004; Vermeesch et al., 2005] were seen in 21/22 subjects and were considered polymorphisms. In addition, three subjects showed submicroscopic deletions and duplications not previously reported as normal variants. Two of these submicroscopic changes were of de novo origin (microdeletions at 7q36.3 and a microduplication at 11q12.3-13.1) and one was of unknown origin as parental testing of origin could not be performed (microduplication of Xp22.3). The clinical description of the three subjects with submicroscopic chromosomal changes at 7q36.3, 11q12.3-13.1, Xp22.3 is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".