MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057139662 · doi:10.1016/j.carj.2010.07.005

Case of the Month #176: Pseudoaneurysm of the Cystic Artery

2012· article· en· W2057139662 on OpenAlexaff
Jaron Chong, Timothy O’Connell, Peter L. Munk, Natalie Yang, Alison Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Association of Radiologists Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyVomitingAbdominal painPresentation (obstetrics)Epigastric painCholecystitisEmergency departmentAbdomenSurgeryRadiologyPseudoaneurysmMedical historyCystic arteryPast medical historyPancreatitisCommon bile ductGallbladderAneurysmCystic duct

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 56-year-old man presented to the emergency department from an assisted-living facility with a 2-week history of fevers and epigastric pain, and a 24-hour history of emesis. Initially, there was coffee-ground emesis followed by vomiting of bright red blood. The patient’s medical history included recurrent urinary tract infections, multiple sclerosis, as well as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy performed 7 years earlier for choledocholithiasis. There were no other operations, procedures, or recent abdominal symptoms until this presentation. A diagnosis of sepsis secondary to suspected cholecystitis was made, and the patient was started on broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. A computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was performed (Figure 1) followed by an abdominal ultrasound (Figure 2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0090.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Association of Radiologists JournalSame topicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207