Most safely on the fence? A round table on the possibility of a Canadian foreign policy after 9/11
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The attacks of September 11, 2001, changed both the nature of world politics and how Canadians perceive their place in the world. Subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq only reinforced the sense that something of epochal significance had occurred. The organizers of the Canadian section of the International Studies Association wondered if the notion of something "Canadian" in foreign policy might no longer be relevant in a world reconfigured by the pre‐eminence of the US and its single‐minded pursuit of its war on terror. A round table was held on this question at the February 2003 meeting of the association in Portland, Oregon. This article reproduces the edited remarks that each participant presented at that time, with a second round of comments that each participant made in response to the other presentations and to subsequent questions posed by the moderator. Les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 ont changé à la fois la nature de la politique mondiale et la vision que les Canadiens ont de leur place dans le monde. Les guerres qui ont suivi, en Afghanistan et en Irak, n'ont fait que renforcer le sentiment que quelque chose d'historique venait de se produire. Les organisateurs du chapitre canadien de l'Association des études internationales se sont demandé si le concept de "canadianité" en politique étrangère ne risquait pas de devenir obsolète dans un monde réorchestré par la prééminence des États‐Unis et leur fixation exclusive sur la "guerre contre la terreur". Une table ronde sur la question a été organisée lors de la réunion tenue en février par l'association à Portland, en Oregon. Cet article reproduit la version éditée des interventions de chaque participant ainsi que des réactions individuelles aux autres présentations et des réponses des participants aux questions posées par le modérateur. Notes Moderator Robert Wolfe is Associate Professor in the School of Policy Studies, Queen's University. Contributors are: Louis Bélanger, Directeur, Institut québecois des hautes études internationals, Université Laval; Andrew F. Cooper, Professor of Political Science at the University of Waterloo and Associate Director of the Centre for International Governance Innovation; Claire Turenne Sjolander, Associate Professor of Political Science, Associate Dean (Academic) and Secretary, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa; and Heather A. Smith, Associate Professor and Chair of International Studies, University of Northern British Columbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it