Histological alterations of intestinal villi in growing pigs fed soybean and pigeon pea seed meals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To clarify whether specific damage to intestinal tissue is induced by feeding pigs pigeon pea seed meal (PM), growing pigs were fed soybean meal (SM) or PM, and intestinal villi and epithelial cells on the tip of villi were compared using light and electron microscopy. Fifteen 85-d-old pigs were allotted to three groups of five animals each. Within each group, a pig was randomly assigned to: (1) a conventional (control) diet, (2) SM or (3) raw PM for 10 d. At the end of the experiment three pigs per group were randomly slaughtered. Intestinal villus height, cell area and cell mitosis tended to be highest in the SM group and lowest in the PM group. Dome-like cells were seen on the surface of villi in SM group, but flat cells were observed in the PM group. These histological data suggest that intestinal villi are much more activated in pigs fed SM than PM. However, the fact that physical damage was not observed on the tips of villi in pigs fed PM suggests that raw PM could be used as a plant protein source by adding it as a supplement to conventional diets. Key words: Pigeon pea, soybean, intestinal villi, pig
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".