Use of novel prokinetic agents to facilitate return of gastrointestinal motility in adult critically ill patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intolerance of enteral feeding due to impaired gastrointestinal motility is common in critically ill patients. Strategies to prevent or treat gastrointestinal hypomotility include the use of prokinetic agents. Many currently employed prokinetic agents are associated with serious adverse drug reactions. The novel prokinetic agents - alvimopan, tegaserod, and dexloxiglumide - are reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Alvimopan exerts mixed, but generally favorable, effects on restoration of gastrointestinal motility in patients with postoperative ileus. The observation of increased opioid requirements (without increased pain scores) and associated clinical ramifications requires further study. Tegaserod stimulates the peristaltic reflex and improves motility in multiple sites along the gastrointestinal tract. Its efficacy in improving gastrointestinal hypomotility in the critically ill population has not yet been determined. Furthermore, its use has been associated with the development of ischemic colitis and increased requirement for abdominal/pelvic surgery. Dexloxiglumide may be beneficial for improving gastric emptying in critically ill patients, especially those receiving lipid-enriched enteral feeds. SUMMARY: Novel prokinetic agents show promise for management of gastrointestinal hypomotility in the critically ill population. However, further study is required before these agents can be recommended for use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".