Photophysics of Self-Assembled Zinc Porphyrin−Bidentate Diamine Ligand Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of complexation--by bidentate nitrogen-containing ligands such as pyrazine and 4,4'-bipyridine commonly used for porphyrin self-assembly--on the photophysics of the model metalloporphyrin, ZnTPP, are reported. Ligation to form the 5-coordinate species introduces an intramolecular charge transfer (ITC) state that, depending on the oxidation and reduction potentials of the electron donor and acceptor, can become involved in the excited state relaxation processes. For ZnTPP, ligation with pyridine has little effect on excited state relaxation following either Q-band or Soret band excitation. However, coordination of ZnTPP with pyrazine and bipyridine causes the S(2) (Soret) state of the ligated species to decay almost exclusively via an S(2)-ICT-S(1) pathway, while affecting the S(1) decay route only slightly. In these 5-coordinate species the S(2)-ICT-S(1) decay route is ultrafast and nearly quantitative. Literature redox data for other bidentate ligands such as DABCO and multidentate ligands commonly used for pophyrin assembly suggest that the ITC states introduced by them could also modify the excited state relaxation dynamics of a wide variety of multiporphyrin arrays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".