Rectal tissue, plasma and urine concentrations of mesalazine after single and multiple administrations of 500 mg suppositories to healthy volunteers and ulcerative proctitis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with ulcerative proctitis may have rectal mucosal properties different from healthy volunteers. This project compared the pharmacokinetics of rectally administered mesalazine in these two populations. METHODS: In two separate studies, nine patients with ulcerative proctitis and 16 healthy volunteers received a single 500 mg mesalazine suppository and then 500 mg every 8 h for 5 days. Blood samples were collected for 12 h in healthy volunteers and 30 h in patients, and urine for 24 h in healthy volunteers and 30 h in patients. Rectal biopsies were performed 8 h after the last dose. RESULTS: After a single dose to patients, mean mesalazine half-life (s.d.) was 5.0 (3.6) h. At steady-state, means (s.d.) were 89.1 (78.9) ng/mL for C(min), 361.1 (240.8) ng/mL for C(max), and 7.1 (7.3) h for half-life. Mean (range) rectal mesalazine concentrations were 167 (1.4-541.6) ng/mg tissue. After a single dose in healthy volunteers, mean (s.d.) half-life was 4.0 (4.7) h. At steady-state, means (s.d.) were 22.4 (61.6) ng/mL for C(min), 359.4 (166.3) ng/mL for C(max), and 0.9 (0.5) h for half-life. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine is released in the rectum of patients, with a bioavailability of about 40%. Tissue distribution is also appreciable. Both parameters appear higher than in healthy volunteers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".