MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057251717 · doi:10.1002/qua.21937

On the use of the exact exchange optimized effective potential method for static response properties

2009· article· en· W2057251717 on OpenAlexaff
Mykhaylo Krykunov, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic orbitalKohn–Sham equationsChemistryChemical shiftWork (physics)HOMO/LUMOMoleculeAtomic physicsComputational chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsDensity functional theoryPhysical chemistryElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the present work, we question the notion that the modified Kohn–Sham orbital energies and smaller HOMO‐LUMO gaps, produced from the exact exchange optimized effective potential (EXX‐OEP) method, might significantly improve the paramagnetic contribution to the NMR chemical shifts compared with the regular Hartree–Fock (HF) scheme. First of all, it is shown analytically that if there is such a local potential that produces the HF energy, and the Kohn–Sham orbitals are obtained as a result of separate rotations of the occupied and virtual HF orbitals, any static magnetic property obtained from the coupled perturbed HF method will be identical to that obtained from the EXX‐OEP approach. In fact the EXX‐OEP method is equivalent to the improved virtual orbitals (IVO) scheme in which the energies of the virtual orbitals are modified by an effective potential. It is shown that the IVO procedure leaves static response properties unchanged. To test our analysis numerically we have employed several variants of the EXX‐OEP method, based on the expansion of the local exchange potential into a linear combination of fit functions. The different EXX‐OEP schemes have been used to calculate the NMR chemical shifts for a set of small molecules containing C, H, N, O, and F atoms. Comparison of the deviation between experimental and calculated chemical shifts from the HF, the EXX‐OEP, and the common energy denominator approximation (CEDA) approximation to the EXX‐OEP methods has shown that for carbon, hydrogen, and fluorine the EXX‐OEP methods do not yield any improvement over the HF method. For nitrogen and oxygen we have found that the EXX‐OEP performs better than the HF method. However, in the limit of infinite fit basis set and, as a consequence of it, a perfect fit of the HF potential the EXX‐OEP and the HF methods would afford the same chemical shifts according to our theoretical analysis. Unfortunately, without a perfect fit the chemical shifts from the EXX‐OEP method strongly depend on the fit convergence. In our opinion, the EXX‐OEP method should not be used for response properties as it is numerically unstable. Thus, any apparent improvement of the EXX‐OEP method over the HF scheme for a finite fit basis set must be considered spurious. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207