The mechanism of improved sodium homeostasis of low-dose losartan in preascitic cirrhosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Renal sodium retention on standing is one aspect of the abnormal renal sodium handling in preascitic, well-compensated patients with cirrhosis. Recently, it has been shown that low doses (7.5 mg) of the angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonist, losartan, can reverse renal sodium retention on high, 200-mmol sodium/d diet in these patients and restore them to sodium balance. Therefore, the effect of 7.5 mg of losartan on sodium excretion, when changing from supine to erect posture for 2 hours, was examined in 10 well-compensated patients with cirrhosis and 9 age- and sex-matched controls on the same sodium diet, under strictly controlled metabolic conditions. In contrast to control subjects, in whom sodium excretion was unaffected, single 7.5-mg doses of losartan again restored the preascitic patients with cirrhosis to sodium balance. In addition, it blunted the fall in erect posture- induced renal sodium excretion by a reduction in proximal and distal tubular reabsorption of sodium. These changes occurred without any significant changes in blood volumes, systemic and renal hemodynamics, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and filtered sodium load compared with controls, and despite activation of the systemic renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which was still within normal levels. In conclusion, the beneficial natriuretic effects of low-dose losartan on erect posture - induced sodium retention in preascitic cirrhosis supports the suggestion that the pathophysiology of sodium retention in preascites is in part caused by an intrarenal tubular effect of Ang II in that posture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".