MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057282921 · doi:10.12807/ti.105202.2013.r01

Scarpa, F. Translated and adapted by M. A. Fiola (2010). La traduction spécialisée: Une approche professionnelle à l’enseignement de la traduction

2013· article· fr· W2057282921 on OpenAlexaff
Denise Merkle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceHumanitiesSociologyEngineeringPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federica Scarpa’s La traduction spécialisée: Une approche professionnelle à l’enseignement de la traduction [Specialized Translation: A Professional Approach to Teaching Translation] translated from the Italian into French by Marco A. Fiola is an important and welcome publication on teaching specialized translation, for, as the translator rightfully claims in his preface (p. vii), this volume responds to a need for new textbooks on specialized translation in countless language combinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Translation and Interpreting ResearchSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207