Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Characterize Pedicle Asymmetry in Both Normal Patients and Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. Morphometric analysis of vertebrae from normal patients and patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Objectives. To use magnetic resonance imaging to assess pedicle asymmetry in normal patients and patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the early stages of scoliosis development and to determine if patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis exhibited a consistent vertebral morphology. Summary of Background Data. To date, most studies of vertebral morphology in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have produced conflicting data, especially on pedicle length, and have been conducted on patients in the late stages of scoliosis development, which may affect the patterns of vertebral morphology detected. Magnetic resonance imaging enables in vivo assessment of curves during development and permits improved acquisition of transverse images. Methods. Magnetic resonance images of 76 pedicles from 8 normal patients and 80 pedicles from 10 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were examined retrospectively. Recorded parameters included pedicle lengths, pedicle widths, pedicle areas, pedicle perimeters, and lamina lengths. The extent and direction of asymmetry in vertebrae from normal patients and patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were determined and compared. Results. Normal patients displayed significant neural arch asymmetry, with the left sided measurements being greater. Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis also displayed significant neural arch asymmetry; however, the longer pedicle was not consistently on the convexity or the concavity. Conclusions. The baseline used to assess adolescent idiopathic scoliosis vertebral morphology must take into consideration the extent and direction of normal vertebral asymmetry. The pattern of vertebral asymmetry seen inadolescent idiopathic scoliosis may depend on the specific cause of the disorder, with no consistent pattern evident when data from different causes are pooled together. Pedicle asymmetry was compared in normal patients and pa-tients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using magnetic reso-nance imaging. Both populations exhibited significant pedicle asymmetry, with the direction of this asymmetry being consis-tent in normal patients and inconsistent in patients with ado-lescent idiopathic scoliosis. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the direction of pedicle asymmetry may depend on the specific cause of scoliosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".