Dediazoniation of <i>p</i>-hydroxy and <i>p</i>-nitrobenzenediazonium ions in an aqueous medium: Interference by the chelating agent diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have made a comparative study of the dediazoniation of p-hydroxy and p-nitrobenzenediazonium ions. The electron-withdrawing and donating properties of the -NO2 and -OH groups strongly determine the reactivity of both compounds, thus exerting different influences upon the dediazoniation reaction. We describe here how the decomposition of p-hydroxy and p-nitrobenzenediazonium ions in a neutral aqueous medium follows a different pattern in the presence of the metal-chelator diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). The decomposition rate of p-hydroxybenzene diazonium decreases whilst the decomposition of the p-nitrobenzenediazonium ion is enhanced. The experimental data are discussed with reference to a common scheme of interference for both benzenediazonium ions in the light of the radical-scavenging capacity of DTPA.Key words: p-hydroxybenzenediazonium ion, p-nitrobenzenediazonium ion, di-ethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, dediazoniation, radical scavenging, artifacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".