MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metal fluxes at the water sediment interface of shallow mine tailings ponds, Heathe Steele mines, New Brunswick.

2004· article· en· W20574275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Poirier, J L Gravel, Claude Fortin, Lise Rancourt, Peter G. C. Campbell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsSedimentTailings damEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringGeologyWaves and shallow waterHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringOceanographyGeomorphologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissolved water constituent concentration profiles were established at the surface watersediment interface in the three submerged tailings cells at the Heath Steele Mine (NB, Canada) using in situ dialysis peepers and trace metal clean techniques.Dissolved surface water trace element concentrations ranged from the low nanomolar level for cadmium (~ 10 -9 M) to the high nanomolar level for zinc (~10 -7 M).Concentrations decreased in the order: Zn > Ni > Cu > Pb ~ As ~ Se > Tl > Cd.Overall, dissolved porewater metal concentrations increased with sediment depth in the lower and upper cells and remained relatively unchanged in the north cell.From the established profiles, diffusional fluxes of copper, lead, zinc, nickel, cadmium, arsenic and thallium ions at the water-sediment interface were calculated.Comparison of results from duplicate peepers demonstrated an important spatial variability within each cell.Fluxes were nevertheless mostly negative, indicating a release of metals from the sediments to the water column.These fluxes were however quite low and would be expected to reverse in direction if more reducing conditions appear in the sediments as the tailings age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207