MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057437153 · doi:10.1021/ic7008545

Magnetic Circular Dichroism of Porphyrins Containing M = Ca, Ni, and Zn. A Computational Study Based on Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory

2007· article· en· W2057437153 on OpenAlexaff
G. A. Peralta, Michael Seth, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCircular dichroismDensity functional theoryMagnetic circular dichroismVibrational circular dichroismCrystallographyComputational chemistryQuantum mechanicsSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical study is presented on the magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) exhibited by the porphyrin complexes MP (M = Mg,Ni,Zn), MTPP (M = Mg,Ni,Zn), and NiOEP, where P = porphyrin, TPP = tetraphenylporphyrin, and OEP = octaethylporphyrin. The study makes use of a newly implemented method for the calculation of A and B terms from the theory of MCD and is based on time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT). It is shown that the MCD spectrum is dominated by a single positive A term in the Q-band region in agreement with experiment where available. The band can be fully explained as the first transition in Gouterman's four-orbital model for the type of porphyrins studied here. For the Soret band, the experimental MCD spectrum appears as a single positive A term. This is also what is found computationally for NiP and NiTPP, where the second transition in Gouterman's four-orbital model give rise to a positive A term. However, for the remaining systems, the simulated MCD spectrum is actually due to two B terms that have the appearance of one positive pseudo A term. The two B terms appear because the second Gouterman state is coupled strongly to a second excited state (b(2u) --> 2e(g)) of nearly the same energy by the external magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207