Magnetic Circular Dichroism of Porphyrins Containing M = Ca, Ni, and Zn. A Computational Study Based on Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A theoretical study is presented on the magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) exhibited by the porphyrin complexes MP (M = Mg,Ni,Zn), MTPP (M = Mg,Ni,Zn), and NiOEP, where P = porphyrin, TPP = tetraphenylporphyrin, and OEP = octaethylporphyrin. The study makes use of a newly implemented method for the calculation of A and B terms from the theory of MCD and is based on time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT). It is shown that the MCD spectrum is dominated by a single positive A term in the Q-band region in agreement with experiment where available. The band can be fully explained as the first transition in Gouterman's four-orbital model for the type of porphyrins studied here. For the Soret band, the experimental MCD spectrum appears as a single positive A term. This is also what is found computationally for NiP and NiTPP, where the second transition in Gouterman's four-orbital model give rise to a positive A term. However, for the remaining systems, the simulated MCD spectrum is actually due to two B terms that have the appearance of one positive pseudo A term. The two B terms appear because the second Gouterman state is coupled strongly to a second excited state (b(2u) --> 2e(g)) of nearly the same energy by the external magnetic field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".