MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057438731 · doi:10.5430/wje.v4n1p62

Effects of Two and Three-Dimensional Visual Objects on the Acquisition of Drawing Skills among JSS1 Students in Osun State, Nigeria

2014· article· en· W2057438731 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bada Tayo Abass, Bello Isyakka, Ijisakin Yemi Olaolu, Fajuyigbe Michael Olusegun

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpatial Cognition and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationTest (biology)PsychologyStratified samplingSignificant differenceLocal government areaObject (grammar)Local governmentMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study examined the effects of two and three dimensional visual objects on learners’ drawing skills in juniorsecondary schools in OsunState.Nigeria.It also determined students’ ability to identify visual objects. Furthermore, itinvestigated the comparative effectiveness of two and three dimensional visual objects on drawing skills of juniorsecondary school students.The study employed the pretest, post- test experimental design. The study populationconsisted of all junior secondary school one students in Osun State. Three junior secondary schools were purposivelyselected from Atakumosa Local Government Area of Osun State. A sample of 120 JSS1 students was selected from thethree schools using stratified sampling techniques with sex as stratum. These were later randomly assigned into twoexperimental and one control groups. The first experimental group was taught drawing using three-dimensional visualobjects; the second experimental group was taught using two-dimensional visual objects, while group three the controlgroup was taught using conventional method. The research instrument was a Visual Object Achievement Test (VOAT).This was administered as pre test and post test. Data gathered were analyzed using ANOVA and t-test statistics.Theresults showed that there was a significant difference in the basic drawing skills of learners taught with visual objectsand those taught without visual objects (F = 14.163, p< 0.05). The results also showed that there was a significantdifference in the identification ability of learners taught with two and three dimensional visual objects and those taughtwith conventional method. (F = 4.599, p< 0.05).The study concluded that the use of two and three dimensional objectswill anhance drawing skills.Furthermore, the results showed that there was no significant difference in the acquisition of drawing skills betweenmale and female students who were taught using two and three dimensional visual objects (t = 2.02, p< 0.05 ).The study concluded that the use of two and three-dimensional visual objects significantly enhanced students’ drawingability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicSpatial Cognition and NavigationFrench-language works237,207