MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057477900 · doi:10.1143/ptps.155.307

Quasi-Periodic Inward Shock Formation from an Accretion Disk to a Black Hole and Its Application to Quasi-Periodic Oscillations in Microquasars

2004· article· en· W2057477900 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAccretion (finance)Black hole (networking)Accretion discKerr metricRotating black holeQuasi periodicShock (circulatory)Shock waveRotation (mathematics)MechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed 1.5D general relativistic simulations using a Kerr metric without disk viscosity for a model of high frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) in microquasars. We found that quasi-periodic inward shock waves propagate from the accretion disk toward the black hole when we initially inject a disturbance into the disk. The frequency of the shock formation is approximately equal to the maximum epicyclic frequency in the disk (κmax), which is on the order of the frequency of high frequency QPOs in microquasars. κmax depends on the rotation of the black hole, and therefore we can estimate the value of the spin parameter of a black hole candidate (BHC) in a microquasar by comparing the high frequency QPO with κmax. We found that such values can be roughly estimated as 0.0 ≤a ≪ 0.4 for GRS 1915+105 and 0.85 ≪ a ≪ 1.0 for GRO J1655-40.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it