Characterization of<i>ndvD</i>, the third gene involved in the synthesis of cyclic β-(13),(16)-<scp>D</scp>-glucans in<i>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we identified two genes in Bradyrhizobium japonicum (ndvB, ndvC) that are required for cyclic beta-(1 --> 3),(1 --> 6)-D-glucan synthesis and successful symbiotic interaction with soybean (Glycine max). In this study, we report a new open reading frame (ORF1) located in the intergenic region between ndvB and ndvC, which is essential for beta-glucan synthesis and effective nodulation of G. max. This new gene is designated ndvD (nodule development). The ndvD translation product has a predicted molecular mass of 26.4 kDa with one transmembrane domain. Genetic experiments involving gene deletion, Tn5 insertion, and gene complementation revealed that the mutation of ndvD generated pleiotropic phenotypes, including hypoosmotic sensitivity, reduced motility, and defects in conjugative gene transfer, in addition to symbiotic ineffectiveness. Although deficient in in vivo beta-glucan synthesis, membrane preparations from the ndvD mutant synthesized neutral beta-glucans in vitro. Therefore, ndvD does not appear to be a structural gene for beta-glucan synthesis. Our hypothesis for the mechanism of beta-(1 --> 3),(1 --> 6)-D-glucan synthesis is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".