Can the role of thermal erosion in strongly deformed komatiite‐Ni–Cu–(PGE) deposits be determined? Perseverance, Agnew‐Wiluna Belt, Western Australia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perseverance, Agnew‐Wiluna Belt, Western Australia, is the largest stratabound komatiitic dunite‐hosted Ni–Cu–(PGE) deposit on Earth. Perseverance is often reported as containing demonstrable evidence for thermal erosion (e.g. truncation of footwall stratigraphy), an essential component in prevailing ore genesis models. Perseverance is a highly strained and strongly altered deposit. The strong alteration and structural overprint have resulted in a metakomatiite unit with no primary volcanological or magmatic contacts with surrounding rocks. Strain is strongly partitioned around the komatiitic dunitic core and the surrounding rocks are largely mylonitic, annealed mylonitic gneisses or schists. The protolith of the surrounding rocks is difficult to assess because of alteration and strain. Previous work suggested that the surrounding stratigraphy was very complicated. The felsic units were described as felsic lapilli tuffs and were interpreted as subaqueous welded ignimbrites. Our reassessment of the footwall to the Perseverance deposit indicates that the footwall consists of a simple stratigraphy of shallow, but coherent, quartz‐ and feldspar‐phyric porphyries and basalt intrusions, which intrude a pelitic sedimentary sequence. Fragmental or pyroclastic units have not been observed nor can they be inferred. The complex stratigraphy described by previous workers and apparent from the present day metamorphic mineral assemblages is a pseudo‐stratigraphy, which is largely a function of deformation and metasomatism. The komatiitic dunitic unit of the Perseverance Ultramafic Complex appears to truncate the basal stratigraphy, in agreement with previous workers. However this basal pseudo‐stratigraphy is itself a function of strain partitioning around the isotropic dunitic unit. In such an environment, any thermal erosional descriptions are highly interpretative. We strongly caution against recent detailed mathematical modelling based on volcanological measurements from these highly altered and strained units.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".