MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057565606 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2330830

Near-Real Time Detection of Beetle Infestation in Pine Forests Using MODIS Data

2014· article· en· W2057565606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asim Anees, Jagannath Aryal

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVegetation (pathology)Time seriesSliding window protocolStatisticsRemote sensingMathematicsGeographyWindow (computing)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers near-real time detection of beetle infestation in North American pine forests using MODIS 8-days 500 m data. Two methods are considered, both using a single time series for detection of beetle infestation by analyzing the statistics of the trend component of the signal. The first method estimates the trend component of the vegetation index time series by fitting an underlying triply modulated cosine model over a sliding window, using nonlinear least squares (NLS), and the second method uses a T-point moving average finite impulse response (FIR) filter. Both the methods perform well and show similar performance on simulated datasets. The methods are also tested on many difference and ratio-indices of a real-world dataset with change and no-change examples taken from the Rocky Mountain region of the United States and of British Columbia in Canada. The results suggest that both the methods detect beetle infestation reliably in almost all the vegetation index datasets. However, the model-based method (NLS-based) performs better in terms of the detection delay. Red Green Index (RGI), when used with the model-based method, provides the best tradeoff between the detection delay and accuracy. Furthermore, 90%, 50%, and 25% cross-validations are also performed for the threshold selection on RGI dataset, and it is shown that the selected threshold works well on the test data. In the end, it is also shown that the model-based method outperforms a recently published method for near-real time disturbance detection in MODIS data, in both accuracy and detection delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207