Study of acid hydrolysis of bromazepam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantitative study of an acid hydrolysis of bromazepam, which in acidic solution simultaneously undergoes reversible 4,5-azomethine bond cleavage and protolytic reactions, was performed (t = 25 °C). When an equilibrium is established, four species are simultaneously present in solution. Two approaches, both based on theoretically derived dependence between the absorbance (A) and the solution acidity ([H3O+]), were used to determine appropriate equilibrium constants. In the first, the least-squares method was used to fit experimentally obtained (A, [H3O+]) value pairs to a derived function. With values obtained as fitting parameters, the probability distribution for equilibrium constants was calculated with the virtual experiments performed using Monte Carlo simulations. In the second one, spectrophotometric analysis indicated an existence of two distinct pH intervals, both with three dominant species involved. Spectral data were used to calculate equilibrium constants by a linear curve fitting analysis. Values obtained for equilibrium constants from the numerical and the experimental approaches are in good accordance and were used to calculate distribution of all the species as a function of pcH. Key words: bromazepam, acid hydrolysis, equilibrium constants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".