An Analysis of the Recent Financial Performance of the Laotian Banking Sector during 2005-2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the adoption of the New Economic Mechanism, banking sector reform was initiated as one of key components of economic reform policy in Laos. Since the process of reform began in Laos, banking sector has undergone significant changes and the performance of banks has improved significantly, especially in recent years. The banking sector reform, which was initiated by the Bank of the Lao PDR in the late 1980s, has brought a competitive environment for banking industry and banks are now offering a wide range of financial services and products to the public. In light of this development, this paper provides an overview of evolution and current structure and developments of the banking sector in the context of reform measures taken over the past two decades. The paper also analyses the financial performance of the banking sector by firstly examining the key financial development indicators and then uses a widely-used CAMEL framework surrounding capital adequacy, asset quality, management efficiency, earnings and profitability and liquidity to evaluate the financial performance. The results of this study is useful for assisting central bankers to know the strengths and weaknesses for formulating strategies and polices that will promote an effective and sound banking system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".