Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of 144 /aC(C)a/ stimuli were constructed (inspired by, e.g., B. Repp, Percept. Psychophys. 24, 471–485 (1978)]). Each consisted of: a vocoid (135 ms steady state followed by 50 ms VC closing transitions); a silent portion; and another vocoid (50 ms CV opening transition plus 250 ms steady state). Four different silent periods [80, 120, 190, and 300 ms] were crossed with six closing transition patterns (ranging from b-like to d-like closures) and with six analogous opening transitions. Thirteen listeners classified each stimulus ten times. Polytomous logistic regression showed that singletons, heterorganic clusters, and geminates all have distinct duration weights. Contrary to expectations, results for place were remarkably simple. Weights for closing transitions show labial closures (/b, bd, bb/) to be widely separated from the coronal closures (/d, db, dd/), but are otherwise homogeneous. Weights for opening cues show a similar dichotomy of labial releases /b, db, bb/ versus coronal releases (/d, bd, dd/); here, however, the singleton /b/ differs slightly from the other labials. A related experiment in Dutch will be discussed and results from both experiments will be compared against proposals from the literature and our own models. [Work supported by SSHRC.].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".