MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057691919 · doi:10.1002/jms.993

Mass spectrometric characterization of efaproxiral (RSR13) and its implementation into doping controls using liquid chromatography–atmospheric pressure ionization‐tandem mass spectrometry

2006· article· en· W2057691919 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mario Thevis, Oliver Krug, Wilhelm Schänzer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mass Spectrometry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Sporthochschule KölnUniversität zu KölnWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryElectrospray ionizationTandem mass spectrometryOrbitrapChromatographyFormic acidCollision-induced dissociationDirect electron ionization liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry interfaceAtmospheric-pressure chemical ionizationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fragmentation (computing)Extractive electrospray ionizationIonizationChemical ionizationElectron ionizationProtein mass spectrometryIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efaproxiral (2-[4-[[(3,5-dimethylanilino)carbonyl]methyl]phenoxyl]-2-methylpropionic acid, formerly referred to as RSR13) is prohibited in sports according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). The drug as well as structurally related compounds and a stable isotope-labeled derivative have been synthesized to elucidate the fragmentation pathway of efaproxiral, using electrospray ionization (ESI) and tandem mass spectrometry by employing a novel linear ion trap--orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer--in positive and negative ionization modes. The elimination of 2-methyl acrylic acid (-86 u) has been identified as a major fragmentation process in both charge states. Negative ionization and collision-induced dissociation (CID) caused an additional release of carbon dioxide (-44 u), and positive ionization the loss of formic acid (-46 u). Efaproxiral was incorporated into an existing screening procedure for doping controls using solid-phase extraction (SPE) followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, enabling a limit of detection of 2.5 ng/ml and interday precisions ranging from 7.9 to 13.0%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207