A Review of Pneumatosis Intestinalis in the Setting of Systemic Cancer Treatments, Including Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pneumatosis intestinalis is a radiologic diagnosis that manifests in a variety of clinical settings. We report 4 cases of pneumatosis intestinalis in patients undergoing cancer treatments that included cytotoxic agents and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. These reports aim to provide insight into the clinical interpretation and pathogenesis of pneumatosis intestinalis in the setting of cancer treatments and demonstrate a potential association with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: Radiologists responsible for the interpretation of adult imaging at our tertiary care centre were surveyed to identify cases of pneumatosis intestinalis arising in the midst of cancer treatment. The case histories were reviewed by physicians with expertise in cancer treatment. RESULTS: Four cases of chemotherapy-related pneumatosis intestinalis were identified. The diagnosis was made in 1 patient during investigations undertaken for non-life-threatening abdominal symptoms and incidentally in 2 patients by abdominal imaging used to measure chemotherapy response. A fourth patient presented in a life-threatening manner, and abdominal imaging was symptom guided. Interestingly, 3 of the 4 patients were receiving treatments that included a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and this agent was the only identifiable potential etiology in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of pneumatosis intestinalis arising during cancer treatments is difficult to interpret because of the complex nature of the diseases and the treatments that often include combinations of cytotoxic agents and/or novel therapies. These reports demonstrate the importance of classifying this radiologic finding according clinical severity rather than etiology and underscore the need for continued observation for unexplained adverse effects when using novel therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".