Role of medial prefrontal cortex dopamine in age differences in response to amphetamine in rats: Locomotor activity after intra‐mPFC injections of dopaminergic ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) dopamine receptor expression and in mPFC projections to the nucleus accumbens in adolescence suggest that there may be age differences in the regulation of drug-related behavior by the mPFC. The age-specific role of prelimbic D1 dopamine receptors on amphetamine-induced locomotor activity was investigated. In experiment 1, rats aged postnatal day 30 (P30), P45, and P75, corresponding to early and late adolescence and adulthood, were given an injection of D1 and D2 antagonists into the prelimbic mPFC before a systemic injection of 1.5 mg/kg of amphetamine and locomotor activity was recorded. In experiment 2, effects of intra-prelimbic injections of a D1 agonist and antagonist on locomotor activity produced by a lower dose (0.5 mg/kg) of amphetamine were investigated. D2 receptor antagonist did not alter amphetamine-induced activity, whereas the D1 receptor antagonist reduced activity produced by 1.5 mg/kg of amphetamine more in P30 than in P45 and P75 rats. In addition, D1 agonist enhanced the locomotor activating effects of 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine in adolescent rats and decreased activity in adult rats. These results suggest that insufficient activation of mPFC D1 receptors may underlie the reduced activity at the low dose of amphetamine in early adolescent compared to adult rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".