Flexural Strength and Modulus Properties of Carbamide Peroxide?Treated Bovine Dentin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effects of carbamide peroxide bleach on tooth structure are uncertain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of direct or indirect carbamide peroxide application on dentin flexural strength and modulus in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentin bars were machined from bovine incisors and treated with 10% carbamide peroxide for 6 h/d for 14 days. Four groups were created, with eight bars in each group: group 1-direct bleach application only; group 2-indirect bleach application only; group 3-direct bleach application followed by a 2-week storage in artificial saliva; group 4-direct bleach application followed by a 2-week storage in artificial saliva and daily topical fluoride treatments. The specimens' flexural strength and modulus were tested after 24 hours, and the results were compared with water controls using independent t-tests (p < .05). RESULTS: Flexural strength results (in megapascals) for bleached versus control dentin (1=205+/-26 vs 215+/-14, 2=257+/-25 vs 261+/-14, 3=180+/-22 vs 193+/-36, 4=157+/-18 vs 184+/-11) were significantly lower in group 4 (p=.005). Modulus results (in gigapascals) for bleached versus control dentin (1=10.7+/-1.4 vs 12.2+/-0.6, 2=14.2+/-1.7 vs 14.4+/-1.6, 3=10.0+/-2.0 vs 10.9+/-1.3, 4=9.0+/-1.2 vs 11.1+/-1.0) were significantly lower in groups 1 and 4 (p=.013 and p=.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in strength and modulus results between the bleached and control dentin in groups 2 and 3. A direct application of carbamide peroxide to bovine dentin significantly decreased some dentin mechanical properties in vitro. An indirect application of carbamide peroxide to dentin did not significantly decrease dentin strength and stiffness. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This in vitro study suggests that a bleaching treatment, when applied to the enamel of intact teeth, does not significantly affect the mechanical properties of the underlying dentin. However, when applied directly to dentin in clinical situations such as root exposure or occlusal attrition, the bleaching treatment may result in altered mechanical properties of dentin. The clinical consequences of this observation are, however, unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".