MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057776214 · doi:10.1210/endo.141.3.7440

Regulation of the Na,K-Pump by Leptin in 3T3-L1 Fibroblasts

2000· article· en· W2057776214 on OpenAlexaff
Gary Sweeney, Wenyan Niu, Ronik Kanani, Amira Klip

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrinology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineLeptinChemistryBiologyMedicineObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leptin, the product of the obesity (ob) gene, controls energy intake and expenditure primarily by actions on the central nervous system. However, recently it has become apparent that leptin also elicits a growing and diverse array of effects on peripheral tissues. The Na,K-pump is an electrogenic plasma membrane protein which actively extrudes 3Na+ ions and imports 2K+ ions per molecule of ATP hydrolysed. The pump is responsible for the maintenance of the electrochemical potential of all cells, which in turn drives all ion-coupled transport mechanisms. In this study we use 3T3-L1 fibroblasts to show that leptin inhibits Na,K-pump activity, as assessed by ouabain-sensitive 86Rb+ uptake. Inhibition of the Na,K-pump correlated with increased serine phosphorylation of the catalytic Na,K-pump alpha1 subunit. Upon investigation of leptin-stimulated signalling pathways using specific pharmacological inhibitors, only wortmannin prevented inhibition of the Na,K-pump by leptin. Moreover, leptin stimulated phosphotyrosine-associated PI 3-kinase activity in these cells. In summary, leptin was found to inhibit Na,K-pump activity, likely via PI 3-kinase. We propose that this effect may have wide ranging cardiovascular and metabolic implications and perhaps explain physiological effects of the hormone such as natriuresis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrinologySame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207