MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057868830 · doi:10.2310/7070.2006.0069

Contralateral Labyrinthine Concussion in Temporal Bone Fractures

2006· article· en· W2057868830 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tuncay Ulug, S. Arif Ulubil

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConcussionTemporal boneSensorineural hearing lossHearing lossTinnitusHead traumaFacial paralysisAudiologySurgeryHead injuryPoison controlInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this case presentation, three cases of labyrinthine concussion in the opposite ears of patients who had unilateral traumatic temporal bone fractures with facial paralysis are reported. The first patient was a 30-year-old male who had a right-sided longitudinal temporal bone fracture and labyrinthine concussion showing pure sensorineural hearing loss with a characteristic notch of 60 dB at 4000 Hz on the left side. The second patient was a 42-year-old male who had a right-sided traumatic facial paralysis owing to a mixed-type temporal bone fracture and labyrinthine concussion, demonstrating pure sensorineural hearing loss reaching its peak of 50 dB at 4000 Hz on the left. The third patient was a 19-year-old male who had a left-sided mixed-type temporal bone fracture and a right labyrinthine concussion exhibiting pure sensorineural hearing loss reaching 60 dB at 4000 Hz. For their facial paralyses, all three patients underwent middle cranial fossa or combined approach operations. The labyrinthine concussion in these patients was managed expectantly. At their 1-year follow-up, it was observed that the hearing loss owing to labyrinthine concussion persisted. Although labyrinthine concussion is not a rare complication of head injuries, it has rarely been reported in the medical literature. The main symptoms of labyrinthine concussion are hearing loss, tinnitus, and dizziness. The diagnosis mainly relies on audiometric tests, which reveal characteristic tracings reminiscent of acoustic trauma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of OtolaryngologySame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207